
Minneapolis Title IX Advocacy
Powerful Legal Assistance for Title IX Sexual Assault Claims
As an important part of the Education Amendments of 1972, Title IX is the federal law of the land – and it explicitly prohibits sex-based discrimination at educational organizations and programs that receive federal funding. Because of Title IX, many organizations have a clear responsibility to investigate sexual misconduct claims and ensure that students are free from sexual harassment, rape, dating violence, and other forms of sex-based discrimination.
However, not all educational institutions are equipped with the means or experience to properly investigate claims under Title IX, making it difficult to ensure that justice is done. As skilled advocates and civil litigators serving Minneapolis, our attorneys at Tamburino Law Group are here to help any individuals and organizations who need assistance with navigating Title IX proceedings.
For more information about how we can help, call (612) 444-5020 or contact us online to schedule a free consultation.
Understanding Title IX Procedures and Enforcement
Title IX proceedings differ from other legal processes in that they do not take place in civil court or criminal court. Rather, it is the responsibility of the institution itself to open a Title IX proceeding whenever a student reports systemic sex-based discrimination, sexual harassment, stalking, or sexual misconduct, although they may also be required to report the incident to law enforcement as well. Across the United States, more than 16,500 local school districts and 7,000 post-secondary institutions are currently bound by Title IX.
Some of the most common organizations where recipients have Title IX obligations:
- Universities and colleges
- For-profit schools and charter schools
- Athletic clubs
- Recreational sports leagues
- Vocational rehabilitation and education agencies
- Libraries
- Social organizations
- Museums
- Housing assistance programs
To ensure broad compliance, the U.S. Department of Education and its Office for Civil Rights have offered guidance on how organizations can report, investigate, and respond to claims of sexual misconduct and discrimination. However, it can still be challenging for institutions to implement effective procedures without the assistance of qualified legal counsel.
Under Title IX, institutions and organizations that receive federal funding must:
- Respond promptly to all sexual violence and discrimination claims
- Have a designated Title IX coordinator
- Offer protection for students during Title IX investigations
- Provide access to confidential support services and counseling
- Report any instances of retaliation against alleged victims
- Conduct impartial investigations and allow for an appeals process
- Take action to end a culture of sexual harassment and violence
- Use the civil standard of the “preponderance of the evidence” to resolve complaints
Protections for Accused Students
Under the old guidance, schools were enforcing a standard of preponderance of the evidence to hold an accused student responsible for misconduct. This standard required only that it was more likely than not that misconduct occurred. Accused students were being found responsible and having life changing consequences based on poor investigations and low standards of proof. The final regulations now will allow schools to choose their standard of evidence between preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing. Whichever standard a school chooses, it must be the same for both employee and student misconduct claims.
Advisors have long been calling for changes that accused students were not being afford, and would benefit all parties in the process. For example, accused students will now be entitled to receive written notice of the allegations against them and be informed of their right to have an advisor which maybe an attorney. Further, accused students will be entitled to access all evidence against them whether it is helpful or hurtful to their case. Moreover, accused students will now be presumed innocent placing the burden on the school to seek the truth by collecting evidence through the investigation process. Additionally, postsecondary schools will now be required to hold live hearings where both parties are allowed cross examination through their advisors.
Summary of the Grievance Process Requirements
There are ten groups of provisions under the federal rule that together are intended to provide a standardized framework that governs school’s responses to formal complaints of sexual harassment under Title IX. Generally, the provisions state:
- Acknowledges a school’s treatment of a complainant, or a respondent, could constitute sex discrimination prohibited under Title IX.
- Schools are required to adopt a grievance process that:
- treats complainants and respondents equitably by recognizing the need for complainants to receive remedies where a respondent is determined responsible and for respondents to face disciplinary sanctions only after a fair process determines responsibility;
- objectively evaluates all relevant evidence both inculpatory and exculpatory, and ensures that rules voluntarily adopted by a recipient treat the parties equally;
- requires Title IX Coordinators, investigators, decision-makers, and persons who facilitate informal resolutions to be free from conflicts of interest and bias and trained to serve impartially without prejudging the facts at issue;
- presumes the non-responsibility of respondents until conclusion of the grievance process;
- includes reasonably prompt time frames for the grievance process;
- informs all parties of critical information about the recipient’s procedures including the range of remedies and disciplinary sanctions a recipient may impose, the standard of evidence applied by the recipient to all formal complaints of sexual harassment under Title IX (which must be either the preponderance of the evidence standard, or the clear and convincing evidence standard), the recipient’s appeal procedures, and the range of supportive measures available to both parties; and
- protects any legally recognized privilege from being pierced during a grievance process.
- Requires written notice of the allegations to both parties, including informing the parties of the right to select an advisor of choice.
- Require schools to investigate formal complaints, describe when a formal complaint is subject to mandatory or discretionary dismissal, require the recipient to notify the parties of any dismissal, and authorize discretionary consolidation of formal complaints when allegations of sexual harassment arise out of the same facts or circumstances.
- Requires schools to investigate formal complaints in a manner that:
- keeps the burden of proof and burden of gathering evidence on the recipient while protecting every party’s right to consent to the use of the party’s own medical, psychological, and similar treatment records;
- provides the parties equal opportunity to present fact and expert witnesses and other inculpatory and exculpatory evidence;
- does not restrict the parties from discussing the allegations or gathering evidence;
- gives the parties equal opportunity to select an advisor of the party’s choice (who may be, but does not need to be, an attorney);
- requires written notice when a party’s participation is invited or expected for an interview, meeting, or hearing;
- provides both parties equal opportunity to review and respond to the evidence gathered during the investigation; and
- sends both parties the recipient’s investigative report summarizing the relevant evidence, prior to reaching a determination regarding responsibility.
- Requires a live hearing with cross-examination conducted by the parties’ advisors at postsecondary institutions, while making hearings optional for elementary and secondary schools (and other recipients that are not postsecondary institutions) so long as the parties have equal opportunity to submit written questions for the other parties and witnesses to answer before a determination regarding responsibility is reached.
- Requires a decision-maker who is not the same person as the Title IX Coordinator or the investigator to reach a determination regarding responsibility by applying the standard of evidence the recipient has designated in the recipient’s grievance process for use in all formal complaints of sexual harassment (which must be either the preponderance of the evidence standard or the clear and convincing evidence standard), and the recipient must simultaneously send the parties a written determination explaining the reasons for the outcome.
- Requires schools to offer appeals equally to both parties, on the bases that procedural deficiencies, newly discovered evidence, or bias or conflict of interest affected the outcome.
- Allows schools to offer and facilitate informal resolution processes, within certain parameters to ensure such informal resolution only occurs with the voluntary, written consent of both parties; informal resolution is not permitted to resolve allegations that an employee sexually harassed a student.
- Requires schools to maintain records and documentation concerning sexual harassment reports, formal complaints, investigations, and adjudications; and to publish materials used for training Title IX Coordinators, investigators, decision-makers, and persons who facilitate informal resolutions on the recipient’s website or make these materials available upon request for inspection by members of the public.
Do I Have the Right to an Attorney in Title IX Claims?
While the rules governing a student’s right to an attorney can vary from state-to-state, alleged victims may be permitted to have legal counsel whenever the alleged perpetrator is also allowed to hire outside counsel for a Title IX defense. Additionally, some organizations may benefit from dedicated legal counsel when pursuing a Title IX investigation or determining how to resolve a given situation. At Tamburino Law Group, our experienced Minneapolis attorneys can offer expertise to both individuals and organizations during Title IX proceedings. With over 100 years of combined experience in the courtroom, we can serve as effective advocates for your needs.
To explore your legal options, call (612) 444-5020 today. For more information on Title IX, visit our FAQ page.
Have Questions?
-
1. Don’t Talk to the Police!
It’s crucial to know that while you should remain respectful with authorities, you have the right to remain silent. This a right protected by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which makes it clear individuals are protected from being compelled to be a witness against him / herself in criminal matters.
It’s important to note that:
- Talking will not help you avoid an arrest. If law enforcement has probable cause to arrest you, then they will arrest you.
- By speaking, you risk making a confession or providing information that can be used to indict you, even unknowingly.
- Even if you feel that information being discussed is “harmless,” it is still in your best interest to invoke your Fifth Amendment right.
-
2. Ask for a Lawyer!As soon as you can you should elect your right to have a defense attorney present. A Minnesota criminal defense lawyer or public defender can ensure the police do not violate your rights and help you avoid saying anything incriminating during questioning. Tamburino Law Group is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, so that we can be by your side whenever you need us. Call now!

MAKING A DIFFERENCE FOR OUR CLIENTS
-
“I don’t know where I’d be without his help”
“I would like to outwardly thank Tyler Dahlen for helping me get through my situation”- P.V. -
“I'm deeply thankful for the team at Tamburino Law Group”
“I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Hannah for her expert guidance and representation throughout the case.”- D.Y. -
“Thank you and your law firm, Mr. Tamburino.”
“If ever I have anyone who needs a lawyer I will most definitely recommend you and your firm.”- C.V. -
“Outstanding and professional”
“Thank you for everything you have done to help me with this court case.”- J.B. -
“Great care and compassion.”
I don't know any lawyers who would do what Tamburino Law Group did for their client. Their care and concern show a great deal about their heart and compassion for others. Thank you for being so supportive.- R.H. -
“This settlement changed my life.”
I came to Tamburino Law Group in 2018 after a severe accident left me unable to work and in constant pain. The firm helped me secure a $700,000 award, far exceeding my expectations. Their tireless efforts have completely changed my life, covering medical bills and future wage loss.- K.M. -
“I cannot thank you enough for your help!”
“Your patience, knowledge and especially your attention to detail was admirable.” -
“This settlement has completely changed my life.”
“This settlement has completely changed my life. I appreciate Joe and Hannah’s tireless effort.”- K.M.

-
Case Dismissal Assault Charges
Attorney Joe Tamburino represented a client in Anoka County on multiple assault charges involving multiple alleged victims. Joe litigated the matter for almost a year, and on the day of trial he got the case dismissed. His client was very happy.
-
Case Resolved Dog Bite
Jason hired Tamburino Law Group and after some months of investigation and litigation, they were able to get him a settlement of more than 10x what he originally would have settled for. He was extremely happy.
-
Reduction of Charges Felony Theft
-
Case Dismissed Assault Charge
Attorney Joe Tamburino was retained on an assault charge in Dakota County on a Thursday, and the case was set for trial the following Monday.
-
No Executed Jail Time Criminal Sexual Conduct 3rd Degree
Real People.
Real Results.
- Assault Charges
- Dog Bite
- Felony Theft
- Assault Charge
- Criminal Sexual Conduct 3rd Degree